Legal realism challenges traditional notions of judicial objectivity by emphasizing the influence of psychological and social factors on judicial decision-making. Understanding the role of judicial psychology provides deeper insights into how judges’ perceptions shape legal outcomes. By examining the interplay between legal realism and judicial psychology, we uncover the cognitive biases and psychological dynamics that…

Legal realism emerged as a critical response to the long-standing principles of legal formalism, questioning the notion that judicial decision-making is purely objective and rule-based. By challenging the assumptions of formalism, legal realism has significantly influenced modern legal thought, sparking debates about the true nature of judicial reasoning and the role of social context in…

Legal Realism challenges traditional views of judicial decision-making by emphasizing the influence of societal, economic, and contextual factors over formal legal rules. Its case-by-case analysis approach underscores the importance of understanding each decision within its unique circumstances. Foundations of Legal Realism and Its Approach to Judicial Decision-Making Legal Realism emerged in the early 20th century…

Legal realism has profoundly influenced contemporary judicial philosophy by emphasizing the practical realities that shape judicial decision-making. Understanding the role of judicial discretion within this framework reveals how personal judgment affects the application of law. This perspective invites reflection on whether judges merely interpret statutes or actively shape legal outcomes through discretion, raising important questions…